For 15 years, Kayla Morris, a former Texas schoolteacher, invested every dollar she could save into a home for her growing family.
When she and her husband sold the house last year, they put the proceeds, $282,153.87, into what they considered a safe place: an account at a thrift startup. Yotta held in a real bank.
Morris, like thousands of other customers, was caught up in the collapse of a behind-the-scenes fintech company called Synapse and was locked out of her account for six months starting in November. She held out hope that her money was still safe. She then learned how Evolve Bank & Trust, the lender where her funds were located, supposed to be detainedwas ready to come back to her.
“We were informed last Monday that Evolve was only going to pay us $500 of that $280,000,” Morris said at a court hearing last week, his voice wavering. “It’s just devastating.”
The crisis begin in May, when a dispute between Synapse and Evolve Bank over customer balances boiled over and the fintech intermediary disabled access to a key system used to process transactions. Synapse has helped fintech startups like Yotta and Juno, which aren’t banks, offer checking accounts and debit cards by connecting them with smaller lenders like Evolve.
Immediately after Synapse’s bankruptcy, which occurred after an exodus of its fintech clients, a court-appointed trustee found that up to $96 million in client funds had been misappropriated. missing.
The mystery of where these funds are are was not resolved, despite six months of legal mediation between the four banks involved. This is mainly because the succession of Andreessen HorowitzSynapse, backed by , does not have the money to hire an outside company to do a full reconciliation of its ledgers, according to Jelena McWilliams, the bankruptcy trustee.
But what is now clear is that ordinary Americans like Morris are bearing the brunt of this deficit and will receive little or nothing from savings accounts.that they believed were supported by the full faith and credit of the United States Government.
The losses demonstrate the risks of a system in which customers did not have direct relationships with banks, but instead relied on startups to track their funds, which offloaded that responsibility to intermediaries like Synapse.
There are thousands more like Morris. While there is no full count yet of those who have been harmed, at Yotta alone, 13,725 customers report being offered a total of $11.8 million despite depositing $64.9 million. dollars, according to figures shared by Yotta’s co-founder and CEO. Adam Moelis.
CNBC spoke with a dozen customers caught in this predicament, people who are owed amounts ranging from $7,000 to well over $200,000.
From FedEx drivers to small business owners, from teachers to dentists, they described losing years of savings after turning to fintechs like Yotta for the higher interest rates offered, for innovative features or because they have been diverted from traditional banks.
A Yotta customer, Zach Jacobs, logged onto the Evolve website on November 4 to find that he was only getting back $128.68 of the $94,468.92 he had deposited – and he decided to act.
The 37-year-old business owner, based in Tampa, Florida, began organizing online with other victims, creating a volunteer council for a group called Fight for our funds. He hopes they will attract the attention of the press and politicians.
So far, 3,454 people have signed, claiming to have lost a total of $30.4 million.
“When you talk to people about it, it’s like, ‘There’s no way this could happen,'” Jacobs said. “A bank has just robbed us. This was the first reverse bank robbery in American history. »
Andrew Meloan, a chemical engineer from Chicago, said he had hoped to see the return of the $200,000 he deposited with Yotta. Earlier this month, he received an unexpected PayPal payout from Evolve for $5.
“When I signed up, they gave me an Evolve routing and account number,” Meloan said. “Now they say they only have $5 of my money and the rest is elsewhere. I feel like I’ve been cheated. »
Unlike meme stocks or crypto betting, in which the user naturally assumes some risk, most customers considered funds held in accounts backed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. as the safest place to keep their money. People relied on Synapse-powered accounts for everyday expenses like buying groceries and paying rent, or to save for major life events like buying a home or having surgery.
Several people interviewed by CNBC said the listing seemed like a good bet since Yotta and other fintechs have announced that deposits are FDIC insured through Evolve.
“We were assured it was just a savings account,” Morris said at last week’s hearing. “We don’t take risks, we’re not gamblers.”
A Synapse contract that customers received after opening a checking account indicated that users’ money was FDIC insured up to $250,000, according to a version seen by CNBC.
“According to the FDIC, no depositor has ever lost a cent of FDIC-insured funds,” the 26-page contract states.
Abandoned by US regulators who have so far refused to act, they have few clear options for getting their money back.
In June, the FDIC made clear that its insurance fund does not cover the bankruptcy of non-bank banks like Synapse, and that in the event of the bankruptcy of such a company, the recovery of funds by the courts was not guaranteed.
Next month, the Federal Reserve said that as Evolve’s primary federal regulator, it would monitor the bank’s progress “in returning all customer funds” to users.
“We have a responsibility to ensure that the bank operates in a safe and sound manner and complies with applicable laws, including laws protecting consumers,” Fed General Counsel Mark E. Van Der Weide said in a press release. letter.
In September, the FDIC propose a new rule that would require banks to keep detailed records of fintech app customers, improving the chances that they will qualify for coverage in the event of a future calamity and reducing the risk of funds disappearing.
McWilliams, herself a former FDIC chair during Trump’s first presidency, told the California judge overseeing Synapse’s bankruptcy case last week that she was “disheartened” that all financial regulators had decided not to not help.
The FDIC and Fed declined to comment for this story, and McWilliams did not respond to emails.
Things hadn’t always seemed so dire. At the start of the proceedings, McWilliams suggested to the judge Martin Barash that customers receive partial payment, which would essentially split the pain between everyone.
But that would have required more coordination between Evolve and other lenders holding customer funds than what ultimately happened.
As the hearings dragged on, the other three institutions, AMG National Trust, Lineage Bank and American Bank, began disbursing the funds they had, while Evolve took months to do what it had initially announced be a complete rapprochement.
At the time of evolution completed During its efforts in October, it said it could only determine which user funds it held, not the location of missing funds. This is due at least in part to “very large mass transfers” of funds without identifying the owner of the money, an Evolve lawyer testified last week.
As a result, the bankruptcy process has produced relative winners and losers.
Some end users recently got all their funds back, while others, like the Indiana FedEx driver Natacha Craftshasn’t received any, she told CNBC.
Evolve claims that “the vast majority” of funds held for Yotta and other clients were transferred to other banks in October and November 2023 at Synapse’s instruction, according to an Evolve spokesperson.
“Where these end-user funds went is an important question, but unfortunately Evolve cannot answer with the data it currently has,” the spokesperson said.
Yotta claims Evolve gave no information to the fintech companies and the trustee about how it determined payments, “despite admitting in court that a deficit existed at Evolve before October 2023,” according to a spokesperson for the startup, who noted that several executives have recently left the bank. “We hope regulators will take note and act.”
In declarations Published ahead of this month’s hearing, Evolve said other banks had refused to participate in its efforts to create a master ledger, while AMG and Lineage said Evolve’s implication that they had the missing funds was “irresponsible and misleading”.
As banks and other parties throw accusations at each other and lawsuits pile up, including ongoing class-action lawsuits, the window for cooperation is quickly closing, Barash said last week.
“As time goes on, I feel like unless the banks involved can sort this out voluntarily, it may not get resolved,” Barash said. “There is nothing optimistic about what I am telling you.”
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com